Monday, 27 February 2012



 
Hypnotism has always been a rather strange phenomenon to me. Although I usually pride myself on not eating up all the junk that my nearest television set throws at me, I’ve been all over the issue of televised hypnotism like a tramp on chips. 

From childhood, I remember shows where hypnotists would conveniently forget to break a spell that they have cast onto unwitting members of the public, resulting in tragic, hectic, but ultimately incredibly humorous effects. Of course, I’ve since realised that hypnotism doesn’t revolve around magic or spells of any sort, and that it is merely the power of suggestion combined with incredible concentration. Be that as it may, hypnotists still receive relatively negative press, even when their doings are not being sensationalised to almost-Daily Mail-esque proportions.
Being a psychology student, I know that stereotypes aren’t healthy, so I jumped at the chance to see Lo Reid, one of Europe’s most famous and prolific hypnotists, in a show at Teesside University on the 23rd of February. 

After a couple of speeches from a bunch of ex-servicemen who had somehow arrived in Middlesbrough with absolutely no money [and without the necessary camouflage and ammo to defend themselves from the chavs in the area], Lo Reid took to the stage; the room filling with expectation from past show-attendees, and bewilderment from skeptics such as myself.  Dressed from head to toe in black leather, a look that suggested she was also available to hire as a low-budget Debbie Harry replacement, Reid attempted a quick stand-up routine to warm up the crowd. By ‘attempted stand-up’, I of course mean that she delivered a tirade filled to the brim with F-bombs and downstairs body-parts, held together with a few genuinely funny punch-lines.

After successfully sourcing 20 volunteers who met her rather stringent criteria [of not being idiots, too drunk, or on medication], the hypnotism finally began. To my dismay, she did not carry a pocket-watch to hypnotise participants with, but insisted that that they had to stare at a specific spot on the wall and relax whilst listening to her instructions. At this point, the audience was told to be as quiet as possible, as this would affect the concentration of the volunteers on stage. While true showmen and show-women, even under these circumstances, would not turn their backs to the audience, all I could really see was the back of Lo Reid’s aging-blonde hair style, and the dead cow that sacrificed its life to provide the skin to make the bulk of her jacket.

Once all of the volunteers were all ‘under’ [and at this point, they were not the only ones feeling ‘veerrrry sleeeeepy’], they were all made to subconsciously act out several scenarios, including being a goldfish, being a train, and somewhat bizarrely, being in their favourite sex positions; a command that resulted in one girl flopping back on her chair and not moving a muscle, and one man roughly grabbing the hypnotist and attempting to mate with her. From this moment on, the show seemed to repeat jokes over, and over again, exposing the crude humour that this country has sadly succumbed to in recent years. Candidates running for NUS Presidency ended up taking their clothes off at various points throughout the show; students hope that this is the only time that they’ll be caught with their pants down.

Other skits included volunteers acting out an Indian Jeremy Kyle sketch [which some called racist], certain participants forgetting the existence of the number 7, and volunteers dancing to BeyoncĂ©’s hit “Single Ladies”, seemingly of their own volition. Unfortunately, I’ve forgotten most of the events that occurred in the rest of the show, proving that I’ve either got a talent for repressing painful memories, or proving how forgettable Lo Reid’s show really is. 

Sadly enough, I’ve seen more highlights in my roommate’s latest hairdo, and the ticket didn’t seem to be worth the paper it was printed on. Duller than a digestive biscuit, and dryer than the desert, the show may be heading to a Student Union bar near you –avoid it at all costs. Lo Reid’s Hypnotist Show is exactly that: low.

2 comments:

  1. As a journalist of over 20 years I'm finding this blog rather misleading. I'm the editor for Reviewgraveyard.com but have also been features editor at Electronics Times and reviews editor at Dreamwatch.

    I felt I had to add my comments to this blog as it seems Ravi Amruth has totally missed to point of Lo Reid's show. As a student in the '90s I "accidentally" witnessed many a hypnotist when I'd turn up to the student union evenings to discover that the act that night was a hypnotist. Generally unfunny and rather dull I wouldn't say that I would have been Lo Reid's greatest defender.

    However, earlier this year I was visiting a campus when Lo Reid was performing. Some of the students implored me to attend as she was rather good. I reluctantly attended - expecting the worse - and was surprised to discover that her show was funny, entertaining and (most importantly) Ms Reid ensured that there was no nudity at all and very little in the way of bad language.

    I found Ravi Amruth's copy a little sloppy - personal attacks on Ms Reid's appearance is uncalled for and had nothing to do with her show. Was he trying to be humerous? Possibly. And "Lo" and "Low" I see what he did there - very drool. But then maybe it's me. Maybe I have bad taste - I happen to quite like digestive biscuits.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your response.

      Firstly, while I acknowledge your comments, I'm rather puzzled with regards to your credentials. Despite being claiming to be an editor, I'm intrigued by your writing style - strangely repeated words, the misspelling of the word "humorous", and the replacement of "droll" with "drool".

      Secondly, I fail to see how this blog is 'misleading' - the prevailing notion expressed throughout this particular post is that there's one word to sum up Lo Reid's show, and that's "bad". I'm not entirely sure where you have been mislead, but please feel free to enlighten me.

      At the end of day, and as with any form of entertainment, it's all down to personal preference - others may absolutely adore Lo's show, but those with a similar sense of humour to mine may absolutely abhor it. I'm just giving my point of view, and I'm sure that the people who read my blog are intelligent enough to form their own.

      Delete